New planning applications this week in UB10 8 then BG, ND, EH, NL, SD, ND and UF. No new appeals. Map link.
Sheet piling works will begin at the West Ruislip site on 19 October. The works are expected to last three weeks.
What we are doing
From the week commencing 19 October we will carry out sheet piling works inside the construction site at West Ruislip. This work will help us to install a temporary tank to be used as stormwater drain to prevent flooding in the work area.
Sheet piles will be installed in sequence along the planned excavation
perimeter to provide temporary walls within the ground to support our
water tank. A mechanical machine will be used to push steel sheets into the
How this work might affect you
A piling rig, cranes and construction machinery will be visible in the area
during these works.
The project team will take every measure to reduce noise impacts, however
you may notice some construction related noise and vibration.
Sheet piles will be pressed into position. In the event that we find hard
ground or obstacles, a vibro-hammer will be used to disturb the ground and
drive the sheets through the hard areas. Should this method be required, it
will be used for approximately one hour per day.
Duration of works
The activity will take place from w/c 19 October for three weeks.
Hours worked will be Monday to Friday 8am to 6pm and 8am to 1pm
We may be on site for an our before the start and/or end of each shift.
What to expect
Delivery and set up of equipment, cranes and piling rigs.
Our piling methods may involve vibrating piles into the ground.
What we will do
Conduct noise and vibration monitoring to ensure works are within project approval limits.
Use water carts to reduce the amount of dust.
New planning applications this week in UB10 8 then HE, NA, HH, LN, QD, UL. Plus UB9 5PG. No new appeals. Map link.
New planning applications this week in UB10 8 then BG, ND, EH, NL, SD, ND and UF. No new appeals. Map link.
Following the London Borough of Hillingdon’s February 2020 decision to refuse permission for the 514 home application on the former Master Brewer site, the Mayor of London called in the application for his own determination. On 3 September, before the Mayor of London made his decision to approve the application at a public hearing, the Greater London Authority confirmed that the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government intervened to delay the granting of permission to give him time to consider whether to call in the application for his own determination.
At the 3 September public hearing, an Ickenham Residents’ Association committee member spoke in opposition to the application on behalf of three Residents’ Associations (Ickenham, Oak Farm and North Uxbridge) and the Ickenham Neighbourhood Forum.
If the Secretary of State calls in the application, it is likely that there will be a public inquiry chaired by a planning inspector, who will make a recommendation to the Secretary of State. The Secretary of State would then make the final decision, and publish the recommendations of the inspector, along with his reasons for agreeing or disagreeing.
We were recently approached by the Architect’s Journal for a comment on the Mayor’s decision. Our response is below…
… quoted as An Ickenham Resident’s Association spokesperson said:
“This attempt to over-rule the London Borough of Hillingdon is particularly controversial as the Local Plan was adopted so recently. Planning policy says tall buildings and suburbs don’t mix and we agree; and it’s just not acceptable to propose so many miserable poorly lit single aspect homes. The Community Masterplan we helped draw up with other local groups provides community facilities, better residential quality and is in proportion to the surrounding area. We very much hope the Secretary of State intervenes. This is not gentle densification, it’s tower block desuburbanisation.”
Our five minute speech at the 3 September public hearing (written in collaboration with the local community groups mentioned above) is reproduced below:
“Thank you for the opportunity to speak today. I am speaking on behalf the Residents’ Associations of Ickenham, Oak Farm and North Uxbridge, the areas bordering the site, and the Ickenham Neighbourhood Forum which includes the site in its Planning area. These associations do truly represent the communities they serve. For example the Ickenham Residents Association has a paid up membership of 2/3 of the households of Ickenham.
Mr Mayor, you will know that Hillingdon has a brand new Local Plan developed in close consultation with its residents and adopted earlier this year without objection by your Authority. It is a plan which recognises the substantial need for new housing and caters for it. We’ve taken a plan-led and democratic approach to agreeing on how our local area should grow. So it’s no surprise that Hillingdon has an impressive track record for delivering new homes, in some years double its target.
But it is quite clear, Mr Mayor, that this proposal is in stark discord with our new Local Plan and indeed the current AND emerging London Plans. The buildings are too tall and the concentration of dwellings too dense. The site is set in a typical metroland suburban location with 2 storey dwellings and a parade of small shops. The proposed development has buildings up to 11 storeys. It would dwarf neighbouring properties across the road and mar the skyline from miles around.
The London Plan defines tall buildings, as ones that are “substantially taller than their surroundings, causing a significant change to the skyline” and says they should be plan-led by the boroughs. The new Local Plan, agreed by your authority, identifies the sites suitable for tall buildings in Hillingdon as Hayes and Uxbridge town centres. The MB site is nowhere near either of them. Indeed your own officer reporting on this application acknowledges that there is a clear conflict.
But even if the development were on a site zoned for tall buildings such as Hayes Town Centre, it would still fall well short of guidance on many other matters. It performs dreadfully against the requirements of the emerging London Plan tall buildings policy on visual impacts, street scene and relationship with surrounding areas.
The density is twice the acceptable level set out in Hillingdon Local Plan and consequentially around a third of the homes would be miserable single aspect units, including 3-bedroom family units facing West over the heavily congested Long Lane, the main N-S arterial route in the borough. Forced to keep their windows closed due to the noise and air pollution, these homes would overheat horrifically.
As you know, Mr Mayor, the site sandwiched between the A40, its exit slip road and Long Lane, is in an Air Quality Management Area and noise pollution saturates the entire site. The applicant has failed to show how in this dense collection of contiguous tower blocks the impact of these pollutions can be mitigated successfully.
The fallout of the pandemic will undoubtedly have consequences for the future of our built environment. Exactly what these will be we cannot say. But it is clear that societal changes due to technology have been accelerated. More and more stores have closed in the move to online shopping and the need for offices is reducing as more employees work from home. Indeed earlier this week Capita announced plans to close more than a third of its offices.
So surely, Mr Mayor, this cannot be the time to start the desuburbanisation of suburbia when so much town centre space could be re-purposed for residential use, breathing new life back into dying town centres. And with more people working from home, the need for homes with gardens and access to good quality amenity space will increase.
Hillingdon Council has identified the Master Brewer site as one suitable for mixed use residential–led development. It has been actively engaged with developers to find good quality housing solutions for the site which fit within the framework of its new Local Plan. Community groups have even drawn up a masterplan for the site. Unfortunately the developers seem only able to come up with increasingly dystopian visions of ever higher, denser and poorer quality development proposals which have been rejected with very good reason.
We ask you, Mr Mayor, to respect the framework of our recently adopted Local Plan and your own London Plan, and in the words of the shadow housing secretary Thangam Debbonnaire, not to bypass local democracy and allow development based on increasing sales and profits rather than actual living conditions, quality and environmental sustainability.”
This updates the post made recently about newsletter availability:
Along with other Ickenham organisations, we are not printing and delivering our normal newsletter for September. We decided that there was no certainty that the situation in September would stay the same, and we would therefore issue the newsletter mainly online. It is available on our website to download.
If you are unable to download it, please email us on Ickenhamresidents@hotmail.com and we will email you a copy. We will also print off a very limited number of paper copies which will be available for those who are not online to collect this week from designated points in the village, which will be Ickenham Library, Dalton’s Egg Van (on Saturdays) and Maison du Soleil.
We trust you understand our reasons for this, but we cannot risk the health and wellbeing of all our volunteers. The situation will be reviewed again before the next newsletter is due out in December.
Normally, we add newsletters to the archive as soon as the next one hits the streets. Unfortunately, due to COVID-19, the street-hitting still hasn’t started up.
You’ll find the Autumn 2020 issue in the website archive.
If you are not a member of the Residents’ Association, for a £2 per annum subscription, you can normally get the newsletters hot off the press. For no extra, and at your choice, the Association will keep you updated with more immediate news by email. If you are a member and don’t get the emails, drop a line to email@example.com
Now that the government has given the notice to proceed for HS2 the work is starting in earnest.
We continue to have regular conference calls with HS2, the main contractors (SCS and Align) and London Borough of Hillingdon.
The most immediate impact in our area will be SCS preparation works in Harvil Road for the Harvil Road realignment(and other works) and Breakspear Road South for the construction of the haul road between West Ruislip and Harvil Road (the haul road was our recommendation in petitioning to avoid HGVs going through the village). This work will lead to lane closures in Harvil Road during October and November and occasional lane closures in Breakspear Road South; we are assured these will be coordinated to ensure one road system is fully working.
There will also be weekend road closures.
The other contractor – Align – will also be working in Harvil Road to construct the haul road to HOAC alongside Dews lane. Their works should be coordinated with SCS.
Align will also be closing the A412 between Denham and Maple Cross with Harvil Road as the diversion – dates to be advised.
The power supply contractor will be completing their works in Jan 21 which will again include some road work in Ickenham Road between West Ruislip site and the White Bear roundabout.
Full details should be available at some time on the HS2 Commonplace site
And the HS2 Helpline number is 08081 434 434 or email HS2enquiries@hs2.org.uk. If you have an issue always put COMPLAINT in your email heading.
We have just heard that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has issued instructions on behalf of the Secretary of State that the GLA should NOT determine the application this afternoon pending review by the Ministry.
New planning applications this week in UB10 8 then NF, RU, HL, NX, NN, BU, DN, TA, BJ, RP and JF. No new appeals. Map link.