Association representatives held a constructive meeting with ward councillors Cllrs Eddie Lavery and Jane Palmer on 30 July to discuss the recent Greater London Authority (GLA) proposal for development around Ickenham. LBH’s position on the matter has been made clear in a recent press release: Council challenges Mayor’s plan over significant threat to Hillingdon’s green belt | Hillingdon Council
We very much support the Council’s position and look forward to further engagement on the subject over the coming months. As with our stance on HS2, we remain opposed in principle, but should further development proposals come forward at the “east of Ickenham” or “west Ruislip” locations identified in the GLA’s emerging London Plan, will engage positively in any formal or informal processes; seeking to maximise mitigation, public engagement and public benefit.
We have asked the Council to, as soon as possible, make available further information about development opportunities in the borough, through the Hillingdon local plan preparation process, so it is clear how much brownfield land is available for development locally.
We have also suggested that a public meeting be held in September, to allow local people to discuss the current situation and hear more about next steps, before the current London Plan consultation closes on 15 October. Further details will be made available soon.
We will also make representations to the GLA, including requesting information on what background work has been carried out to understand the current nature and amenity value of the Marshes, and the flood risk and access challenges that would need to be overcome for any development to take place.
Details of the public footpaths in the area are shown on the Marshes map below. For more detailed information about the public rights of way on the Marshes, which were established by LBH in 2019 following a formal request by the Association, visit https://pre.hillingdon.gov.uk/public-rights-way/definitive-map-statement

We intend to write to the relevant local land agents to request that permissive public access to the fields is maintained. This has, for decades, provided positive health and well-being benefits for local people and important natural surveillance to reduce antisocial behaviour.
